Relative Age Effect: Beyond the Youth Phenomenon.

Introduction. The relative age effect (RAE) refers to performance advantage of youth born in the first quarter of the birth year when auditioning for select, age-restricted sports. This advantage conferred to the older athlete is a result of being more physically and emotionally mature, therefore, assumed to be a more advanced player. We hypothesize an RAE exists in Olympic athletes, and this extends across selected categories of athletes (by gender), such as team versus individual sports, winter versus summer athletes, and sports using a ball versus those not using a ball. Methods. We extended the exploration of an RAE beyond specific sports by examining the birth quarter of more than 44 000 Olympic athlete's birthdates, born between 1964-1996. The data were summarized by birth quarter (January 1 to March 31, etc) and presented as percentages and 95% confidence intervals. Results. The fractions of births in the first versus the fourth quarter were significantly different ( P < .001) from each other for the summer and winter Olympians, ball and nonball sports, and team as well as individual sports. Conclusions. The general presence of an RAE in Olympic athletes exists regardless of global classification.

Relative age effect: beyond the youth phenomenon.

INTRODUCTION: Initially described in a sports context in ice hockey in 1985, the relative age effect (RAE) refers to the performance advantages of youth born in the first quarter of the birth year when trying-out for select, age-restricted sports. The competitive advantage bestowed to the relatively older athlete in their age band is the result of the older athlete being more physically and emotionally mature. These more mature players will likely go on to be exposed to better coaching, competition, teammates and facilities in their respective sport. OBJECTIVES: Our study sought to characterise the ubiquity of this effect by examining the birth distribution of some of the world's most elite athletes, Olympians. METHODS: We extended the exploration of the RAE beyond specific sports by examining the birth quarter of over 44 000 Olympic athlete's birthdates, born between 1964 and 1996. Our hypothesis was that the RAE would be prominent in both Olympic athletes as a whole and in selected subcategories of athletes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The fractions of births in the first versus the fourth quarter were significantly different (p<0.001) from each other for the summer and winter Olympians, ball and non-ball sports, and team as well as individual sports. This significant difference was not gender specific. We found the general existence of the RAE in Olympic athletes regardless of global classification. Our findings suggest that coaching staff should be cognisant of the RAE when working with young athletes and should take relative age into consideration when evaluating a burgeoning athlete's abilities.

Detecting Common Eye Diseases Using the First Teleophthalmology GlobeChek Kiosk in the United States: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the benefit and feasibility of the teleophthalmology GlobeChek kiosk in a community-based program. DESIGN: Single-site, nonrandomized, cross-sectional, teleophthalmologic study. METHODS: Participants underwent comprehensive evaluation that consists of a questionnaire form, brief systemic evaluation, screening visual field (VF), and GlobeChek kiosk screening, which included but not limited to intraocular pressure, pachymetry, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, posterior segment optical coherence tomography, and nonmydriatic fundus photography. The results were evaluated by a store-and-forward mechanism and follow-up questionnaires were obtained through phone calls. RESULTS: A total of 326 participatents were screened over 4 months. One hundred thirty-three (40.79%) participants had 1 condition in either eye, and 47 (14.41%) had >1 disease. Seventy (21.47%) had glaucoma, 37 (11.34%) narrow-angles, 6 (1.84%) diabetic retinopathy, 4 (1.22%) macular degeneration, and 43 (13.10%) had other eye disease findings. Age >65, history of high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, not having a dental examination >5 years, hemoglobn A1c measurement of ≥5.6, predibates risk score of ≥9, stage 2 hypertension, and low blood pressure were found to be significant risk factors. As for the ocular parameters, all but central corneal thickness, including an intraocular pressure >21 mm Hg, vertical cup to disc ratio >0.7, visual field abnormalities, and retinal nerve fiber layer thinning were found to be significant. CONCLUSIONS: GlobeChek kiosk is both workable and effective in increasing access to care and identifying the most common causes of blindness and their risk factors.

It Is All About Value Now: The Data You Need to Collect and How to Do It: AOA Critical Issues.

Health care has entered an era where value and quality have become more important than just quantity. Patient-reported outcomes are a critical aspect of the value equation. Orthopaedic surgeons will need to demonstrate that their treatment regimens actually are enhancing their patients' quality of life. In order to do this, the collection of prospective patient-reported outcome data will be critical. For most patients, this will require the use of a general health survey and a disease-specific questionnaire. Currently, most orthopaedic surgeons are not collecting this type of data. The questions are: What types of patient-generated questionnaires can provide the information needed, and how can these data be collected in a cost-effective manner? We will discuss what value means to payers and what the outcome measures are that are selected by various orthopaedic subspecialty societies to evaluate patients who undergo total hip and knee arthroplasty as well as patients with shoulder and knee problems, and we will review potential strategies to collect prospective patient-outcome data in a cost-effective manner in the office.